Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 0.97, Δ 0.27).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 437 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.