Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 0.94, Δ 0.13).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 381 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 453 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -2.20 | Goals prevented | -2.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.