Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.45 vs 1.10, Δ 0.35).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.63 | Goals prevented | -1.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.