Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 2.05, Δ 0.47).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 279 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 398Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.92 | Goals prevented | -1.92 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.