Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (2.29 vs 1.43, Δ 0.86).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 374 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 446 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.02 | Goals prevented | 1.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |