Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 0.56, Δ 1.14).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 366 |
| 427 | Total passes | 427 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.56 | Goals prevented | 1.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.