Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 6%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 329 | Accurate passes | 380Lead |
| 422 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.