Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 0.78, Δ 0.21).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 374 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 423 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.42 | Goals prevented | -0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.