Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (4.12 vs 1.75, Δ 2.37).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (23 vs 18 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.75 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 22Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 483Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.99 | Goals prevented | 0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.