Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 0.62, Δ 1.49).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (25 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 500Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 579Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |