Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 1.19, Δ 0.34).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 297 | Accurate passes | 512Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 589Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.