Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.24 vs 1.17, Δ 0.93).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 321 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.07 | Goals prevented | 0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.