Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.55, Δ 1.22).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 228 |
| 469Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.