Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (2.54 vs 0.96, Δ 1.58).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- FC Dallas was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 530Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 593Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.40 | Goals prevented | -0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.