Match statistics snapshot
- FC Juarez created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.58, Δ 0.39).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- FC Juarez was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 437Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.