Match statistics snapshot
- Guadalajara Chivas created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.45, Δ 0.30).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Guadalajara Chivas was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |