Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 0.66, Δ 0.78).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 525Lead |
| 381 | Total passes | 624Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |