Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.76 vs 2.21, Δ 0.45).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.21Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 390 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 455 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.00 | Goals prevented | -1.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.