Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.45 vs 1.31, Δ 0.14).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (21 vs 17 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.49 | Goals prevented | -0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |