Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 0.64, Δ 1.84).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.