Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 27%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.