Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.77, Δ 0.39).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 455Lead | Accurate passes | 287 |
| 553Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.32 | Goals prevented | 0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.