Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 0.49, Δ 0.78).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 353Lead | Accurate passes | 245 |
| 436Lead | Total passes | 319 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.47 | Goals prevented | 0.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.