Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 1.05, Δ 0.16).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 388 | Accurate passes | 504Lead |
| 457 | Total passes | 567Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.