Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.49, Δ 0.93).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 439Lead |
| 452 | Total passes | 535Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.