Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.28, Δ 0.85).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 409 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.83 | Goals prevented | 0.83 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |