Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.14, Δ 0.01).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 331 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.