Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 2.06, Δ 0.89).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 376 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 467 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.34 | Goals prevented | 0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.