Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 3.41, Δ 1.87).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (24 vs 18 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.41Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 20Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 448Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| 1.62 | Goals prevented | 1.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.