Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (3.23 vs 2.29, Δ 0.94).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (22 vs 19 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (55% possession).
FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City SC
Fc Cincinnati vs Orlando City Sc
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 15 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 9 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 22Lead | Total shots | 19 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 455Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| -1.35 | Goals prevented | -1.35 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |