Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 1.25, Δ 0.91).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 416 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.69 | Goals prevented | -1.69 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |