Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 413Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | 1 | |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.