Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (3.00 vs 0.62, Δ 2.38).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | St. Louis City |
|---|---|---|
| 3.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | St. Louis City |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 296 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | St. Louis City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | St. Louis City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.24 | Goals prevented | 0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | St. Louis City |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |