Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 352 | Accurate passes | 579Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 669Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.