Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 0.44, Δ 0.45).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 363 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.