Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 0.25, Δ 1.39).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 461Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 416 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.27 | Goals prevented | 0.27 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.