Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 0.69, Δ 0.07).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 390Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.87 | Goals prevented | 0.87 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |