Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 425Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.