Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.82, Δ 0.26).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 566Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 630Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -2.13 | Goals prevented | -2.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |