Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 2.34, Δ 0.78).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.34Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 411Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.23 | Goals prevented | -0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.