Match statistics snapshot
- Napoli created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.54, Δ 0.16).
- Napoli fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 221 | Accurate passes | 645Lead |
| 295 | Total passes | 699Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 1.07 | Goals prevented | 1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |