Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 1.49, Δ 0.55).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 563Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 648Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |