Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 0.31, Δ 1.93).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.31 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 586Lead | Accurate passes | 320 |
| 666Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Randers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |