Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 0.55, Δ 1.59).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 609Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 676Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Sonderjyske |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |