Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.91, Δ 0.89).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 488Lead | Accurate passes | 335 |
| 557Lead | Total passes | 399 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Copenhagen | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |