Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas created the clearer chances on xG (1.76 vs 1.74, Δ 0.02).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74 |
| 6Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.