Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 1.17, Δ 0.10).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 367 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.75 | Goals prevented | 0.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.