Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 15%).
- FC Dallas held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 258 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.