Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 0.56, Δ 0.52).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- FC Dallas held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 344Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.