Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 1.58, Δ 0.52).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 530Lead | Accurate passes | 240 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.73 | Goals prevented | -1.73 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Dallas | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.